Patrick Bearup v. David Shinn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202422-16886California491 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK WADE BEARUP, also named as: No. 22-16886 Patrick Bearup and Patrick W. Bearup, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02485-SPL-MHB Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

RYAN THORNELL, Director of Prison System at Central Office - in his official capacity; DAVID SHINN, Director, in his individual capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Patrick Wade Bearup appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). First Amendment and the Religious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.