Carlton Loeber v. Ameer Alghusain

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202422-16830California288 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLTON BRYAN LOEBER, No. 22-16830

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00505-JD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMEER ALGHUSAIN; AMIDAC;

AMERICAN RAILWAYS LLC; GENERAL

RAILWAYS LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Carlton Bryan Loeber appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

Act (“RICO”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a sua sponte dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Omar v.

Sea-Land…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.