Steven Levi v. Anchorage School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-35170California304 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN C. LEVI, No. 23-35170
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00162-JMK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Joshua M. Kindred, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Steven C. Levi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir.
2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Mpoyo v. Litton Electro-
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Optical Sys., 430 F.3d 985, 987 (9th Cir.…