Michael Perry v. Np Parc Chateaux, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-55211California579 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL MOSHE PERRY, No. 23-55211
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-05378-FLA-MAA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
NP PARC CHATEAUX, LLC, and Incorporated; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Michael Moshe Perry appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging claims related to his eviction. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under the Rooker-
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Feldman doctrine. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.