Michael Perry v. Np Parc Chateaux, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-55211California579 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL MOSHE PERRY, No. 23-55211

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-05378-FLA-MAA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NP PARC CHATEAUX, LLC, and Incorporated; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Michael Moshe Perry appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging claims related to his eviction. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under the Rooker-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Feldman doctrine. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.