Donnell Bledsoe v. San Joaquin County Superior Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-15805California346 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 23-15805
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00158-DAD-KJN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT; GEORGE ABDULLAH, San Joaquin County Superior Court Judge; SPENCER SINCLAIR, Attorney for Pearlie Townes; JOHN M. HARRIS, Lawyer for San Joaquin County Superior Court,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Donnell Bledsoe appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…