Donnell Bledsoe v. San Joaquin County Superior Court

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-15805California346 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 23-15805

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00158-DAD-KJN

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT; GEORGE ABDULLAH, San Joaquin County Superior Court Judge; SPENCER SINCLAIR, Attorney for Pearlie Townes; JOHN M. HARRIS, Lawyer for San Joaquin County Superior Court,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Donnell Bledsoe appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.