Bryce Jackson v. Cathy Gorton
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202422-35771California257 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRYCE JACKSON, No. 22-35771
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00427-YY
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CATHY GORTON; GREG MANSOFF;
MULTNOMAH COUNTY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Washington state prisoner Bryce Jackson appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force
and other constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo cross-motions for summary judgment. Hamby v. Hammond, 821
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 1085, 1090 (9th Cir. 2016). We…