Andrew Straw v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-16039California316 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW U.D. STRAW, Esquire, No. 23-16039

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-02265-TLT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Andrew U.D. Straw appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his action asserting his entitlement to a “merits decision” from the United States

Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.