Andrew Straw v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202423-16039California316 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREW U.D. STRAW, Esquire, No. 23-16039
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-02265-TLT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Andrew U.D. Straw appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing
his action asserting his entitlement to a “merits decision” from the United States
Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watison v. Carter, 668…