Bethesda University v. Cho CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2024G062514California4,034 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

According to the Bylaws, members of the board were to be elected for three-year terms and were eligible for reelection. In the early part of 2021, the membership of the board was not disputed and was composed of 11 members serving staggered three-year terms. A quorum, defined in the Bylaws as a majority of the members, held a meeting in June 2021, at which they nominated and unanimously elected six new board members, some of whom would subsequently form part of the Cho Board. This election was held because the terms of several of the board members were due to expire in May 2022. The new board members expanded the size of the board to 17. Four of the new board members were Presbyterian rather than Pentecostal – Kwon Tae Kim, Myung Ho Seo, Dong Hwan-Choi, and Eric Choi. According to the Kim Board, at the meeting, Cho misrepresented to the members present that Bethesda’s accrediting agency, the Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools (TRACS), required a diversity of denominations in its leadership, although this was 2 disputed. The Kim Board asserts this misrepresentation resulted in the election of the four Presbyterian members. Kyung Moon Kim served as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.