Carlos Landeros v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202419-72855California494 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS A. LANDEROS, No. 19-72855 Agency No. Petitioner, A034-266-469 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Carlos A. Landeros, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order affirming an asylum officer’s

negative reasonable fear determination. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence an IJ’s negative reasonable fear

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). determination, and we review de novo due process challenges to reasonable fear

proceedings. Orozco-Lopez v. Garland, 11…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.