Douglas Gray v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202423-55318California524 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS G. GRAY, an individual; No. 23-55318 ARLENE GRAY, an individual, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:22-cv-03090-DSF-PVC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 25, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Douglas and Arlene Gray are an elderly couple who unfortunately fell victim

to an online scam. Arlene Gray ended up transferring almost $70,000 from her

Chase Bank checking account to scammers who falsely claimed to be Amazon

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). customer service representatives. The Grays sued Chase for (1) assisting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.