Dean Steeves v. Irs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202422-56170California290 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEAN ALLEN STEEVES, No. 22-56170

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00838-WQH-DDL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Dean Allen Steeves appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action seeking to void notices of

deficiency issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Dexter v. Colvin, 731 F.3d 977, 980

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2013). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.