Daniel Boudette v. Tammy Oskerson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202422-36003California893 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DANIEL BOUDETTE, No. 22-36003 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:22-cv-00071-BMM-KLD v.
MEMORANDUM*
TAMMY OSKERSON; ADAM OWENS;
GREGORY G. COSTANZA; GRANITE
PEAK LAW, PLLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 29, 2024**
Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Daniel Boudette appeals from the district court’s order dismissing
this case for lack of jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)
and, alternatively, for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6). The district court held that Boudette’s sole federal claim—a claim
against his ex-wife and her Montana attorneys under the Racketeer Influenced and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel…