Chad Begay v. Winslow, City Of
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202423-15013California424 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHAD D. BEGAY, No. 23-15013
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-08051-DLR-MHB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WINSLOW, CITY OF; CARL
CALNIMPTEWA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Chad D. Begay appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
as untimely his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an excessive force claim arising
out of his arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo. Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal as time-barred
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and equitable tolling analysis where…