Alim Urmancheev v. Hunter Anglea
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202422-15701California380 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALIM URMANCHEEV, No. 22-15701
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00791-DAD-BAK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
HUNTER; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Former California state prisoner Alim Urmancheev appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging access-to-
courts and deprivation of property claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. §…