Michael Smith v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202423-55030California301 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL SMITH, No. 23-55030
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00798-DMS-BGS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Michael Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his action brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) seeking to
collaterally attack his criminal conviction entered in the Eastern District of
Kentucky. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Smith’s request for oral argument, set…