Karlene Petitt v. David Altman

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARLENE K. PETITT, No. 23-35339

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01366-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID B. ALTMAN,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Karlene K. Petitt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing as untimely her diversity action alleging a fraud claim under

Washington law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim, Puri v. Khalsa, 844 F.3d 1152, 1157

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2017), and we affirm.

The district court properly…