Ganiyu Jaiyeola v. Apple, Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, No. 23-16124

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:23-cv-03462-EJD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

APPLE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motions for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order

(“TRO”) in his federal and state law employment discrimination action. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Am. Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d…