Kime

Kime v. Dignity Health CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2024A166748California5,460 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 3/29/24 Kime v. Dignity Health CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RYAN KIME,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A166748

v. DIGNITY HEALTH, INC., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC20586388) Defendant and Respondent.

Dr. Ryan Kime was the subject of a disciplinary proceeding by the Medical Board of California, which resulted in a public reprimand. While that proceeding was ongoing, Kime applied for privileges in the emergency department of two hospitals owned by Dignity Health, Inc. (Dignity). The hospitals stopped processing Kime’s application a few days after the effective date of the reprimand, and Kime subsequently sued Dignity for injunctive relief and damages, alleging that Dignity violated his common law and statutory rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.