Rav-Noy

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Because this appeal is from a judgment pursuant to an order granting summary judgment, in summarizing the salient facts, “[w]e consider all the evidence set forth in the moving and opposition papers except that to which objections were made and properly sustained by the trial court” and “ ‘ “view the evidence in a light favorable to plaintiff as the losing party [citation], liberally construing [his or] her evidentiary submission while strictly scrutinizing defendants’ own showing, and resolving any evidentiary doubts or ambiguities in plaintiff ’s favor.” (Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400 (2001) 25 Cal.4th 763, 768 . . . .)’ ” (South Lake Tahoe Property Owners Group v. City of South Lake Tahoe (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 735, 745 (South Lake Tahoe).) “ ‘We accept as true both the facts shown by the losing party’s evidence and reasonable inferences from that evidence. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 856 . . . .)’ ” (South Lake Tahoe, supra, at p. 745.)

A. Purchase of the 6317 Wilshire Property In 2004, Khorsandi and Illulian met with Rav-Noy, and Khorsandi presented himself as the owner of a property located at 6317 Wilshire…