Hester

Hester v. Southern Cal. Regional Rail Authority CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2024B321396California846 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 3/29/24 Hester v. Southern Cal. Regional Rail Authority CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

LUTHER HESTER, B321396

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21AVCV00128 v.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY

DBA METROLINK,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael C. Kelley, Judge. Affirmed. Luther Hester, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Ivie McNeill Wyatt Purcell & Diggs, Rickey Ivie and Marie Maurice for Defendant and Respondent. ____________________ Luther Hester sued Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink) for premises liability. Metrolink and Hester traded demurrers and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.