Villanueva Carlos v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202423-130California1,165 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA GUADALUPE VILLANUEVA No. 23-130 CARLOS; ADALID ORTIZ Agency Nos.

VILLANUEVA, A215-870-825

A215-870-826

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 27, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Maria Guadalupe Villanueva Carlos, 1 a native and citizen of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Petitioner’s underlying application for relief lists her minor son as a derivative beneficiary. The son’s application was based on the same experiences set forth in Petitioner’s application, so our analysis applies to both petitioners.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.