Walter Scott v. Martin Biter
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202421-56089California643 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 1 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALTER STEVE SCOTT, No. 21-56089
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-06125-DSF-LAL v.
MARTIN BITER, Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 15, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: BOGGS,** NGUYEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Walter Scott appeals the denial of his habeas petition. We review a district
court’s denial of a habeas petition de novo. Musladin v. Lamarque, 555 F.3d 830,
835 (9th Cir. 2009). Under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
(“AEDPA”), we may reverse only if the last reasoned state court’s decision was
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,…