Richard Angelucci v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202423-55246California722 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD ANGELUCCI, an individual, No. 23-55246

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00435-AJB-JLB v.

ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, MEMORANDUM* United States Department of Homeland Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 28, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Richard Angelucci is a former Transportation Security

Administration (TSA) employee. He appeals from the summary judgment entered

in favor of his employer, Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Secretary of Homeland Security, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.