Jimenez

Jimenez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202422-1075California667 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO AMADOR No. 22-1075 JIMENEZ; MARGARITA HERNANDEZ Agency Nos.

AMADOR, A075-750-239

A075-750-240

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 26, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Julio Amador Jimenez and Margarita Hernandez Amador, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals (BIA) denying their third motion to reopen their immigration

proceedings.1 We dismiss the petition for review for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.