Castillo-Santana

Castillo-Santana v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202422-1220California606 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCELA CASTILLO-SANTANA, No. 22-1220 Agency No. Petitioner, A072-989-520 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 28, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Marcia Marcela Castillo-Santana, a native and citizen of Mexico,

seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We deny

the petition.

“When the BIA affirms without opinion under its streamlining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.