Chales Ordones v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202423-45California723 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 1 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE CHALES ORDONES, No. 23-45 Petitioner, Agency No.
A200-106-222
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 28, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: GRABER, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jose Chales Ordones,1 a native of Guatemala and a member of the Mam
Mayan indigenous community, petitions for review of an order from the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of a final order of removal
issued by an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his applications for asylum,
withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).