Chales Ordones v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202423-45California723 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 1 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE CHALES ORDONES, No. 23-45 Petitioner, Agency No.

A200-106-222

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 28, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jose Chales Ordones,1 a native of Guatemala and a member of the Mam

Mayan indigenous community, petitions for review of an order from the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of a final order of removal

issued by an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.