Brandi Smith v. Gail Chase
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-15208California298 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRANDI SHAKIA SMITH, No. 23-15208
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00459-GMS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GAIL CHASE, Chief Operating Officer; NICOLE BOSCO, Human Resources Director; LINDA WILEY, Executive Director; KIMBERLY ROMERO, Human Resources Director,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Brandi Shakia Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing
for lack of personal jurisdiction her action alleging employment discrimination and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de…