Brandi Smith v. Gail Chase

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-15208California298 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDI SHAKIA SMITH, No. 23-15208

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00459-GMS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GAIL CHASE, Chief Operating Officer; NICOLE BOSCO, Human Resources Director; LINDA WILEY, Executive Director; KIMBERLY ROMERO, Human Resources Director,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Brandi Shakia Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

for lack of personal jurisdiction her action alleging employment discrimination and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.