Barbara Robinson v. City of Phoenix

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-15269California279 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARBARA STUART ROBINSON, No. 23-15269

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00651-JFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF PHOENIX,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James F. Metcalf, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted March 26, 2024***

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Barbara Stuart Robinson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging procedural due process and state

law claims arising out of an injury that occurred on city property. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.