Barbara Robinson v. City of Phoenix
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-15269California279 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON, No. 23-15269
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00651-JFM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF PHOENIX,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James F. Metcalf, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted March 26, 2024***
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Barbara Stuart Robinson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging procedural due process and state
law claims arising out of an injury that occurred on city property. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.…