Symon Mandawala v. Era Living LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-35345California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYMON MANDAWALA, No. 23-35345

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01179-RAJ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ERA LIVING LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Symon Mandawala appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his federal civil rights action alleging that defendant, its attorney in

prior state court litigation, and a state court judge, conspired to violate his rights.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a sua sponte

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mandawala’s request for oral argument, set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.