Nithya Vinayagam v. Andrew Pierce

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NITHYA VINAYAGAM, No. 23-15307

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05281-TLT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANDREW F. PIERCE; PIERCE SHEARER

LLP; SCOTT M. BERMAN; THOMAS

MIHILL; JACQUETTA LANNAN; PAUL

M. HELLER; HELLER IMMIGRATION

LAW GROUP; ADAMS LAW OFFICES,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Nithya Vinayagam appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action alleging various federal and state law claims arising out of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). prior litigation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de…