Frederick Pina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-55614California352 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FREDERICK DAVID PIÑA, No. 23-55614
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02672-MCS-SK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Frederick David Piña appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th
Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Stewart v. U.S.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bancorp, 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th…