People v. Ranieri CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 2024B332033California464 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

A person is entitled to resentencing relief pursuant to section 1172.6 if (1) “[a] complaint, information, or indictment was filed against the petitioner that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder [or] murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine”; (2) the petitioner “was convicted of murder”; and (3) the petitioner “could not presently be convicted of murder . . . because of changes to Section 188 or 189 made effective January 1, 2019.” (Id., subd. (a)(1)-(3).) In January 2019, our Legislature amended section 188 to provide that “in order to be convicted of murder, a principal in

3 a crime shall act with malice aforethought” and that “[m]alice shall not be imputed to a person based solely on his . . . participation in a crime.” (Id., subd. (a)(3), as amended by Stats. 2018, ch. 1015, § 2.) The amendment ensures that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, nor was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life. (People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952, 959.) Effective January 1, 2022, the Legislature…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.