In re B.M. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 2024C098400California3,722 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 4/2/24 In re B.M. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

In re B.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile C098400 Court Law.

SHASTA COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN (Super. Ct. No. 22JV3245101)

SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

H.M.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant, who is father of the minor, appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders. (Welf. & Inst. Code §§ 300, 361, 395; undesignated statutory references are to this code.) Father claims (1) the juvenile court violated his right to be present at the jurisdiction and disposition hearing, (2) the court and the Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) failed to adequately comply with the inquiry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.