Weng
Weng v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202422-1184California717 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
XIN XING WENG, No. 22-1184 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-928-146 v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 29, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: GOULD, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Xin Xing Weng petitions for review of the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of a denial by an Immigration
Judge (“IJ”) of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.