Weng

Weng v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202422-1184California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIN XING WENG, No. 22-1184 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-928-146 v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 29, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Xin Xing Weng petitions for review of the decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of a denial by an Immigration

Judge (“IJ”) of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

Where, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.