Tellez-Muro

Tellez-Muro v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-213California560 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAMIRO TELLEZ-MURO, No. 23-213 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-670-908 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 26, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: WARDLAW and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CORLEY, District Judge.***

Ramiro Tellez-Muro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.