Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-143California749 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SURINDER SINGH, No. 23-143 Agency No. Petitioner, A097-586-573 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 29, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, WALLACH,*** and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Surinder Singh (“Singh”), a 58-year-old native and citizen of India, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the

petition.

“A denial of a motion to reopen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.