Ramirez Ramirez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202422-920California541 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO RAMIREZ RAMIREZ, No. 22-920 Agency No. Petitioner, A087-046-957 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 29, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Ramirez Ramirez (Ramirez), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his motion to

reconsider a previous BIA decision denying Ramirez’s untimely motion to reopen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal proceedings sua sponte. “[T]his court has jurisdiction to review Board

decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the limited purpose of reviewing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.