Kimberly Copeland v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202418-17327California609 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY COPELAND, individually and No. 18-17327 on behalf of the Estate of Sean Copeland and the Estate of Brodie Copeland, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05851-WHO

Plaintiff-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

TWITTER, INC.; FACEBOOK, INC.;

GOOGLE, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

DANELLE SINCLAIR, as Guardian Ad No. 19-15625 Litem for A. Tucker and O. Tucker; ISABELLA TUCKER, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-05710-SBA

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

TWITTER, INC.; GOOGLE, LLC;

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

MANDY PALMUCCI, No. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.