Gonzalez-Utz

Gonzalez-Utz v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202423-240California918 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL DE JESUS GONZALEZ- No. 23-240 UTZ; MARIA PAULINA GONZALEZ- Agency Nos.

SUNUC, A201-448-718

A201-448-717

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 28, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, LEE, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Manuel De Jesus Gonzalez-Utz (Gonzalez-Utz) and Maria Paulina

Gonzalez-Sunuc (Gonzalez-Sunuc), natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their

appeal of the finding by an Immigration Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.