Jimenez Alejandres v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202422-1864California657 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMA ANGELICA JIMENEZ No. 22-1864 ALEJANDRES; AMERICA NATALI Agency Nos.

MUNOZ JIMENEZ, A209-395-034

A209-395-035

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 1, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: OWENS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William Horsley Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Norma Angelica Jimenez Alejandres (“Jimenez”), a native and citizen of

Mexico, petitions for review of the Board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.