Murriel Hays v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202423-55165California539 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MURRIEL L. HAYS, No. 23-55165 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-01997-RAO v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Rozella Ann Oliver, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 29, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, IKUTA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Claimant Murriel Hays appeals from the district court’s ruling affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her applications for disability insurance

benefits. We review the district court’s order de novo and reverse only if the

Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision was not supported by substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.