Maureen Murphy v. Gina Raimondo
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 3 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAUREEN MURPHY, individually and No. 23-35166 on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals; JOHN HUDDLESTON, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05377-DGE individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals,
MEMORANDUM*
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GINA RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David G. Estudillo, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 25, 2024** Seattle, Washington
Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellants Maureen Murphy and John Huddleston, residents of Washington
and California respectively, received and declined to complete the American