Lozano MacIel v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202423-484California735 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSALIA LOZANO MACIEL; V. L. N., No. 23-484 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A215-906-042

A215-906-043

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 1, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.***

Rosalia Lozano Maciel and her minor daughter, V.L.N., (collectively,

“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal of the denial by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.