Pfeiffer

Pfeiffer v. Smart CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 2024C097484California3,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 4/3/24 Pfeiffer v. Smart CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

CHARITIE PFEIFFER, C097484

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. SCV0048884)

v.

HEATHER L. SMART,

Defendant and Respondent.

This appeal arises out of civil harassment proceedings. After a traffic collision, plaintiff Charitie Pfeiffer filed a petition for a civil harassment restraining order against defendant Heather Smart under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6.1 The trial court denied Pfeiffer’s petition without prejudice and later granted Smart’s motion for attorney fees and costs. On appeal from that order, Pfeiffer argues that Smart was not entitled to

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.