Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202422-15857California725 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao, No. 22-15857

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00325-JAM-AC v.

JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr.; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 2, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,*** District Judge.

In this pro se action, Yi Tai Shao, a lawyer under suspension by the California

State Bar, alleges that her suspension resulted from “wide-spread fraud and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. conspiracy”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.