Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202422-15857California725 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao, No. 22-15857
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00325-JAM-AC v.
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr.; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 2, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,*** District Judge.
In this pro se action, Yi Tai Shao, a lawyer under suspension by the California
State Bar, alleges that her suspension resulted from “wide-spread fraud and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. conspiracy”…