Vivian Barajas v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-55151California783 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

VIVIAN LYNN BARAJAS, No. 23-55151

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-07976-SK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Steve Kim, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 1, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON, VANDYKE, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Claimant Vivian Barajas appeals the district court’s decision affirming the

Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s denial of her applications

for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II

and XVI of the Social Security Act. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.