Louis Taylor v. County of Pima
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-15110California733 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LOUIS TAYLOR, a single man, No. 23-15110
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:15-cv-00152-RM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF PIMA, a body politic; CITY OF TUCSON, a body politic,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 28, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
The County of Pima and City of Tucson (collectively the “County”) appeal
the district court’s order denying their motion to unseal a declaration. (Dkt. 509).
The order is not final, but the County argues that we may nevertheless exercise
jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine. We disagree and therefore dismiss
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. this appeal.
Under the collateral order doctrine, we may review a narrow class of
decisions…