Louis Taylor v. County of Pima

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-15110California733 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOUIS TAYLOR, a single man, No. 23-15110

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:15-cv-00152-RM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF PIMA, a body politic; CITY OF TUCSON, a body politic,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 28, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

The County of Pima and City of Tucson (collectively the “County”) appeal

the district court’s order denying their motion to unseal a declaration. (Dkt. 509).

The order is not final, but the County argues that we may nevertheless exercise

jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine. We disagree and therefore dismiss

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. this appeal.

Under the collateral order doctrine, we may review a narrow class of

decisions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.