Aaron Greenspan v. Omar Qazi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202422-16110California821 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AARON GREENSPAN, No. 22-16110
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-03426-JD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
OMAR QAZI; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 1, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,*** District Judge.
Aaron Greenspan appeals the dismissal of his defamation action against
Elon Musk and Tesla, the denial of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. motion, and the denial of a motion to recuse the district judge. We review…