Aaron Greenspan v. Omar Qazi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202422-16110California821 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AARON GREENSPAN, No. 22-16110

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-03426-JD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

OMAR QAZI; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 1, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,*** District Judge.

Aaron Greenspan appeals the dismissal of his defamation action against

Elon Musk and Tesla, the denial of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, Chief Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. motion, and the denial of a motion to recuse the district judge. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.