United States v. Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-1060California372 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1060 D.C. No. 6:22-cr-00316-AA-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MEMORANDUM*
JUSTIN WADE SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 26, 2024**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Justin Wade Smith appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 11-month sentence imposed upon the second revocation of his supervised
release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Smith claims that the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). its reasons for choosing an 11-month sentence…