United States v. Jackson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202423-474California335 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-474 D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00531-PA-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

DON WILLIAM JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Don William Jackson appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 60-month sentence imposed upon the fourth revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jackson contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

consider or address his mitigating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.